Cancel the F-35

A petition to the United States Congress and the governments of Australia, Italy, the Netherlands, Norway, Turkey, the United Kingdom, Israel, Japan, South Korea, Denmark, and Canada from the world and from the people of Burlington, Vermont, and Fairbanks, Alaska, where the F-35 is to be based. Initiated by Vermont Stop the F35 Coalition, Save Our Skies Vermont, Western Maine Matters, Alaska Peace Center, University of Alaska Fairbanks Peace Club, North Star Chapter 146 Veterans For Peace, World Beyond War,, Code Pink, Ben Cohen. Supported by: Centro Documentazione Manifesto Pacifista Internazionale, International Organization for the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination, Nej tak til nye kampfly (in Denmark), Peaceful Skies Coalition (in Santa Fe, NM), Straits Area Concerned Citizens for Peace, Justice, and the Environment (in Michigan).

Please add your name below:

The F-35 is a weapon of offensive war, serving no defensive purpose. It is planned to cost the U.S. $1.4 trillion over 50 years. Because starvation on earth could be ended for $30 billion and the lack of clean drinking water for $11 billion per year, it is first and foremost through the wasting of resources that this airplane will kill. Military spending, contrary to popular misconception, also hurts the U.S. economy (see below) and other economies. The F-35 causes negative health impacts and cognitive impairment in children living near its bases. It renders housing near airports unsuitable for residential use. It has a high crash rate and horrible consequences to those living in the area of its crashes. Its emissions are a major environmental polluter.

Wars are endangering the United States and other participating nations rather than protecting them. Nonviolent tools of law, diplomacy, aid, crisis prevention, and verifiable nuclear disarmament should be substituted for continuing counterproductive wars. Therefore, we, the undersigned, call for the immediate cancellation of the F-35 program as a whole, and the immediate cancellation of plans to base any such dangerous and noisy jets near populated areas. We oppose replacing the F-35 with any other weapon or basing the F-35 in any other locations. We further demand redirection of the money for the F-35 back into taxpayers' pockets, and into environmental and human needs in the U.S., other F-35 customer nations, and around the world, including to fight climate change, pay off student debt, rebuild crumbling infrastructure, and improve education, healthcare, and housing.

1-25 of 33676 signatures
Number Date Name Location Please add comment.
33676 1 day ago Kathy Woods Alameda , CA , US
33675 6 days ago Nancy Hatfield Marysville , CA , US
33674 1 week ago Gina Campbell Louisville , KY , US
33673 1 week ago Stephen Gifford Vero Beach, FL , US
33672 1 week ago Mark Nolan Albuquerque, NM , US
33671 1 week ago Bill Michel Redwood City, CA , US
33670 2 weeks ago Miki Jablkowska London, ot , GB Madness! Wake up & stop damaging the world and its citizens.
33669 2 weeks ago Anonymous Evanston, IL , US
33668 2 weeks ago Ira Kriston Evanston, IL , US
33667 3 weeks ago Anonymous Chico, CA , US
33666 3 weeks ago Barry adams Dartford, ot , GB Enough!
33665 3 weeks ago Anonymous N/A, ot , AU The F-35 JSF designs will not meet specification nor the operational requirements laid down in the JSF JORD (Joint Operational Requirements Document) by significant degrees, noting that thes
In essence, the unethical Thana Marketing strategy used to sell the F-35, along with the acquisition malpractice of concurrency in not only development, production and testing but the actual designs of the F-35 variants, themselves, have resulted in the F-35 marketeers writing cheques that the aircraft designs and F-35 Program cannot honour.

Lockheed Martin is a tremendously effective marketing organisation and they acquire all kinds of political influence both through the route of politics of the country, contributing to parties, through retired officers, and through their own marketing organisation which is extremely effective. It is an amazingly good marketing organisation backed by a company that doesn’t build very good aeroplanes.

Its thana marketing strategy which is basically designed to enable Lockheed Martin to rape any nation\'s pillaging taxpayers money in the western world for the next 40 to 50 years.

The observation the F-35A doesn\'t come within a bull\'s roar of being the best aircraft for the US and the allies is right on the money.

The trajectory on which this folly has been allowed to place Ministries and Departments of Defence around the western world begs the question:

"What is America and its closest allies like Canada, Australia, Japan and other allied nations are going to do in the post-2015 \'stealth-on-stealth\'/\'counter-stealth world\' when all the leading reference threats (both airborne and surface based), being produced by some of the world\'s best new-age capitalists, all have the common design aim of overmatching and defeating the F-22A Raptor and B-2A Spirit stealth aircraft; especially when there are so few of these particular assets to be a persuasive deterrent let alone an effective defence?"'); return false;">...
33664 3 weeks ago Anonymous Sacramento, CA , US
33663 3 weeks ago Gretchen Boise Salem, VA , US
33662 3 weeks ago Miriam Maayan Montréal, QC , CA
33661 4 weeks ago Walter J Smith Enterprise, OR , US Yes, we need to stop the F-35. And it seems we also need, perhaps more urgently, and actually democratic party. From a brief perusal of this page: it seems that roots actio...
33659 4 weeks ago Anonymous The Internet , ot , AU Down with your wars and military that is responsible for the death of innocent civilians. We don't need any more weapons of death; especially weapons that cost as much as 1.4 trillion.
33658 4 weeks ago Anonymous Hooksett, NH , US The sums wasted on this boondoggle are shameless. The positively humane things that could be accomplished with a fraction of the money involved is staggering. Why does our government and lawmakers...
33657 1 month ago Mike Rojas Houston, TX , US
33656 1 month ago Timothy Johnston San Francisco, CA , US
33655 1 month ago Larry Sherk Springfield, VT , US United States militarism is holding back the entire world which is obviously mature enough to enter an era a peace and negotiation. I am intensely disgusted that my own country is a menace and a cu...
33654 1 month ago Erwin Haverkort Groningen , NL
33653 1 month ago Frans De Maegd Sint-Joris-Weert, BE De Russen halen ze toch uit de lucht als ze worden ingezet!
33652 1 month ago Louis Kreusel Austin, TX , US $1.4 trillion over 50 years - I veto using my tax dollars to support this in the least.
Next ->

By taking action you will be automatically signed up for action alerts from RootsAction. We consider your contact information to be private and confidential. We will NOT disclose it to any other entity unless you specifically authorize us to do so. You can unsubscribe at the bottom of any email you receive from us.

To endorse as an organization click here.

Why this matters:

The F-35 will kill and destroy while making us all less safe.
The F-35 is a first strike stealth weapon designed to penetrate air space undetected. It will be used for massive killing and destruction in more wars like Iraq, Libya, Yemen, Syria, and Vietnam in which millions of civilians have been killed and wounded and millions of refugees created. Despite the misery they caused, these wars did not make people in the United States safer, and they made things worse in each of the countries that U.S. warplanes and soldiers attacked. In fact, CIA director John Brennan told the U.S. Senate Intelligence Committee on June 16, 2016, that the wars since 2001 have not worked: “… despite all our progress against ISIL on the battlefield and in the financial realm, our efforts have not reduced the group’s terrorism capability and global reach.” In fact the war on terrorism has predictably and demonstrably increased rather than reduced terrorism. Gallup polling now finds that much of the world considers the United States the greatest threat to peace on earth. Nor is a fighter/bomber, like the F-35, capable of protecting anyone against nuclear ICBMs, cruise missiles, cyber attacks, global warming, or any individual acts of terrorism. The F-35 is designed for, among other things, delivery of the B61-12 nuclear weapon. Alaska's Congressional delegation has indicated several times that the F-35 is right for Alaska because of its proximity to Russia, making this weapon part of the new and perilous cold war.

The F-35 is a damaging trade-off.
1. Cost: The U.S. Air Force says the F-35 program will cost $1,400,000,000,000 over 50 years. The F-35 strips public money to pay private war contractors, like Lockheed Martin, that could better be spent to alleviate suffering, erase student debt, rebuild roads and bridges, defend against global warming, and provide education, health care, and housing. The money taken from such vital public use goes instead to war profiteers, increasing inequality and social division in the United States and elsewhere.

2. The F-35 destroys far more jobs than it creates: Researchers at the University of Massachusetts* report that each billion dollars spent on military preparations costs the United States between 4 and 16 thousand jobs as compared with tax cuts for working people or identical spending on clean energy, healthcare, or education. Thus, the $1.4 trillion, 50-year F-35 program means fewer jobs in the 45 U.S. states involved.

3. The F-35 causes cognitive impairment of children: The U.S. Air Force says the F-35A is more than four times louder than the intensely loud F-16 that it is replacing. A World Health Organization (WHO) report says that noise at the level of the F-35 on takeoff for just one minute is sufficient to cause health consequences: The WHO report states that children are more sensitive than adults, and the report cites data showing that the effects of such aircraft noise on children include cognitive impairment: adverse effects on reading, memory, auditory discrimination, speech perception, and academic performance, as well as other health effects, including increased blood pressure and increased stress hormones.*

4. The F-35 makes houses unsuitable for residential use: The Federal Aviation Administration says there is no effective mitigation for this noise besides families leaving. In Burlington Vermont, where F-16 jets are now based, the federal government paid to purchase and demolish 150 affordable homes to protect the people from damaging F-16 noise. The U.S. Air Force says that basing 18 F-35 jets at the airport in Burlington will cause 2,252 acres of land holding 2,963 households with 6,663 people to be in the “unsuitable for residential use” noise zone.

5. The F-35 has both a high crash risk and high crash consequences: The U.S. Air Force says all new military jets have a very high risk of crashing. The F-35 has far worse consequences when it crashes in or near people than older jets. Whereas older military jets were made of aluminum, the body of the F-35 is made of military composite materials with a stealth coating which emit highly toxic chemicals, particles, and fibers when set on fire during the inferno when thousands of gallons of jet fuel burst into flames. An Air Force report says this catastrophe should not be allowed to happen near people. The only way to prevent this tragedy from happening is to prevent basing of such military jets in or near densely populated areas, like Burlington Vermont or any of the other towns and cities planned for basing.