Cancel the F-35

A petition to the United States Congress and the governments of Australia, Italy, the Netherlands, Norway, Turkey, the United Kingdom, Israel, Japan, South Korea, Denmark, and Canada from the world and from the people of Burlington, Vermont, and Fairbanks, Alaska, where the F-35 is to be based. Initiated by Vermont Stop the F35 Coalition, Save Our Skies Vermont, Western Maine Matters, Alaska Peace Center, University of Alaska Fairbanks Peace Club, North Star Chapter 146 Veterans For Peace, World Beyond War,, Code Pink, Ben Cohen. Supported by: Centro Documentazione Manifesto Pacifista Internazionale, International Organization for the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination, Nej tak til nye kampfly (in Denmark), Peaceful Skies Coalition (in Santa Fe, NM), Straits Area Concerned Citizens for Peace, Justice, and the Environment (in Michigan).

Please add your name below:

The F-35 is a weapon of offensive war, serving no defensive purpose. It is planned to cost the U.S. $1.4 trillion over 50 years. Because starvation on earth could be ended for $30 billion and the lack of clean drinking water for $11 billion per year, it is first and foremost through the wasting of resources that this airplane will kill. Military spending, contrary to popular misconception, also hurts the U.S. economy (see below) and other economies. The F-35 causes negative health impacts and cognitive impairment in children living near its bases. It renders housing near airports unsuitable for residential use. It has a high crash rate and horrible consequences to those living in the area of its crashes. Its emissions are a major environmental polluter.

Wars are endangering the United States and other participating nations rather than protecting them. Nonviolent tools of law, diplomacy, aid, crisis prevention, and verifiable nuclear disarmament should be substituted for continuing counterproductive wars. Therefore, we, the undersigned, call for the immediate cancellation of the F-35 program as a whole, and the immediate cancellation of plans to base any such dangerous and noisy jets near populated areas. We oppose replacing the F-35 with any other weapon or basing the F-35 in any other locations. We further demand redirection of the money for the F-35 back into taxpayers' pockets, and into environmental and human needs in the U.S., other F-35 customer nations, and around the world, including to fight climate change, pay off student debt, rebuild crumbling infrastructure, and improve education, healthcare, and housing.

176-200 of 34056 signatures
Number Date Name Location Please add comment.
33881 6 months ago Amy Miller Madison, WI , US
33880 6 months ago Anonymous Madison, WI , US I am a strong opponent based on the documented terrible crash record and the tremendous human and environmental costs.
33879 6 months ago les roberts fresno, CA , US
33878 6 months ago Anonymous N/A, ot , AU
33877 6 months ago Cheryl Hanks-Hicks Eugene, OR , US
33876 6 months ago jim bier ferrum, VA , US Please no to such gross lethal expenditures and deployment.
33875 6 months ago David Soumis MC FARLAND, WI , US
33874 6 months ago Anonymous Waunakee, WI , US
33873 6 months ago Sue Jackson Sydney, ot , AU
33872 6 months ago Betty Tsang Forsyth, MO , US STOP KILLING PEOPLE FOR PROFITS! CANCEL THE F-35 PROGRAM!
33871 6 months ago Jonathan Zembol Wendisch Evern, NE , DE
33870 6 months ago Kimberly Lowe Gahanna, OH , US
33869 6 months ago Mary Jo Walters Madison, WI , US
33868 6 months ago Jason Gaylor Roanoke Rapids, NC , US
33867 6 months ago Maria Powell Madison, WI , US
33866 6 months ago Diane Turner Madison, WI , US
33865 6 months ago Fred Lavy Harrisonburg, VA , US What a horrible deadly expense. Eliminate it.
33864 6 months ago Ed Blume MADISON, WI , US
33863 6 months ago Daniel Murphy Lynden, WA , US
33862 6 months ago stefania sani MADISON, WI , US
33861 6 months ago Anonymous N/A, ot , AU For those who claim the F-35 can fulfil both roles into this uncertain future and then I simply say, think again! The F-35 fleet cannot currently meet its peacetime fighter availability requirements...
33860 6 months ago Anonymous N/A, ot , AU Moreover, there is one overriding consideration - whether the F-35A JSF is actually cheaper than other aircraft is irrelevant; the F-35 are not capable of doing the job in the nearer and wider regio...
33859 6 months ago Anonymous N/A, ot , AU Would be prudent to replace the F-35 with new built F-15E+ w/ General Electric F110-GE-132, IRST and APG-82.
33858 6 months ago Anonymous N/A, ot , AU We are already outmatched in the region on air combat. If you send out F-35s against the Sukhoi Su-35s, few if any of them will come back.
33857 6 months ago Anonymous N/A, ot , AU I have confidence that the F-35 will be a loser in the end. Yes, there will always certainly be development issues, but unfortunately it’ll be super complicated to iron out these complex programs su...
Next ->

By taking action you will be automatically signed up for action alerts from RootsAction. We consider your contact information to be private and confidential. We will NOT disclose it to any other entity unless you specifically authorize us to do so. You can unsubscribe at the bottom of any email you receive from us.

To endorse as an organization click here.

Why this matters:

The F-35 will kill and destroy while making us all less safe.
The F-35 is a first strike stealth weapon designed to penetrate air space undetected. It will be used for massive killing and destruction in more wars like Iraq, Libya, Yemen, Syria, and Vietnam in which millions of civilians have been killed and wounded and millions of refugees created. Despite the misery they caused, these wars did not make people in the United States safer, and they made things worse in each of the countries that U.S. warplanes and soldiers attacked. In fact, CIA director John Brennan told the U.S. Senate Intelligence Committee on June 16, 2016, that the wars since 2001 have not worked: “… despite all our progress against ISIL on the battlefield and in the financial realm, our efforts have not reduced the group’s terrorism capability and global reach.” In fact the war on terrorism has predictably and demonstrably increased rather than reduced terrorism. Gallup polling now finds that much of the world considers the United States the greatest threat to peace on earth. Nor is a fighter/bomber, like the F-35, capable of protecting anyone against nuclear ICBMs, cruise missiles, cyber attacks, global warming, or any individual acts of terrorism. The F-35 is designed for, among other things, delivery of the B61-12 nuclear weapon. Alaska's Congressional delegation has indicated several times that the F-35 is right for Alaska because of its proximity to Russia, making this weapon part of the new and perilous cold war.

The F-35 is a damaging trade-off.
1. Cost: The U.S. Air Force says the F-35 program will cost $1,400,000,000,000 over 50 years. The F-35 strips public money to pay private war contractors, like Lockheed Martin, that could better be spent to alleviate suffering, erase student debt, rebuild roads and bridges, defend against global warming, and provide education, health care, and housing. The money taken from such vital public use goes instead to war profiteers, increasing inequality and social division in the United States and elsewhere.

2. The F-35 destroys far more jobs than it creates: Researchers at the University of Massachusetts* report that each billion dollars spent on military preparations costs the United States between 4 and 16 thousand jobs as compared with tax cuts for working people or identical spending on clean energy, healthcare, or education. Thus, the $1.4 trillion, 50-year F-35 program means fewer jobs in the 45 U.S. states involved.

3. The F-35 causes cognitive impairment of children: The U.S. Air Force says the F-35A is more than four times louder than the intensely loud F-16 that it is replacing. A World Health Organization (WHO) report says that noise at the level of the F-35 on takeoff for just one minute is sufficient to cause health consequences: The WHO report states that children are more sensitive than adults, and the report cites data showing that the effects of such aircraft noise on children include cognitive impairment: adverse effects on reading, memory, auditory discrimination, speech perception, and academic performance, as well as other health effects, including increased blood pressure and increased stress hormones.*

4. The F-35 makes houses unsuitable for residential use: The Federal Aviation Administration says there is no effective mitigation for this noise besides families leaving. In Burlington Vermont, where F-16 jets are now based, the federal government paid to purchase and demolish 150 affordable homes to protect the people from damaging F-16 noise. The U.S. Air Force says that basing 18 F-35 jets at the airport in Burlington will cause 2,252 acres of land holding 2,963 households with 6,663 people to be in the “unsuitable for residential use” noise zone.

5. The F-35 has both a high crash risk and high crash consequences: The U.S. Air Force says all new military jets have a very high risk of crashing. The F-35 has far worse consequences when it crashes in or near people than older jets. Whereas older military jets were made of aluminum, the body of the F-35 is made of military composite materials with a stealth coating which emit highly toxic chemicals, particles, and fibers when set on fire during the inferno when thousands of gallons of jet fuel burst into flames. An Air Force report says this catastrophe should not be allowed to happen near people. The only way to prevent this tragedy from happening is to prevent basing of such military jets in or near densely populated areas, like Burlington Vermont or any of the other towns and cities planned for basing.