Cancel the F-35

A petition to the United States Congress and the governments of Australia, Italy, the Netherlands, Norway, Turkey, the United Kingdom, Israel, Japan, South Korea, Denmark, and Canada from the world and from the people of Burlington, Vermont, and Fairbanks, Alaska, where the F-35 is to be based. Initiated by Vermont Stop the F35 Coalition, Save Our Skies Vermont, Western Maine Matters, Alaska Peace Center, University of Alaska Fairbanks Peace Club, North Star Chapter 146 Veterans For Peace, World Beyond War, RootsAction.org, Code Pink, Ben Cohen. Supported by: Centro Documentazione Manifesto Pacifista Internazionale, International Organization for the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination, Nej tak til nye kampfly (in Denmark), Peaceful Skies Coalition (in Santa Fe, NM), Straits Area Concerned Citizens for Peace, Justice, and the Environment (in Michigan).

Please add your name below:

The F-35 is a weapon of offensive war, serving no defensive purpose. It is planned to cost the U.S. $1.4 trillion over 50 years. Because starvation on earth could be ended for $30 billion and the lack of clean drinking water for $11 billion per year, it is first and foremost through the wasting of resources that this airplane will kill. Military spending, contrary to popular misconception, also hurts the U.S. economy (see below) and other economies. The F-35 causes negative health impacts and cognitive impairment in children living near its bases. It renders housing near airports unsuitable for residential use. It has a high crash rate and horrible consequences to those living in the area of its crashes. Its emissions are a major environmental polluter.

Wars are endangering the United States and other participating nations rather than protecting them. Nonviolent tools of law, diplomacy, aid, crisis prevention, and verifiable nuclear disarmament should be substituted for continuing counterproductive wars. Therefore, we, the undersigned, call for the immediate cancellation of the F-35 program as a whole, and the immediate cancellation of plans to base any such dangerous and noisy jets near populated areas. We oppose replacing the F-35 with any other weapon or basing the F-35 in any other locations. We further demand redirection of the money for the F-35 back into taxpayers' pockets, and into environmental and human needs in the U.S., other F-35 customer nations, and around the world, including to fight climate change, pay off student debt, rebuild crumbling infrastructure, and improve education, healthcare, and housing.


226-250 of 34056 signatures
Number Date Name Location Please add comment.
33831 6 months ago mukund sharma new delhi, ot , IN
33830 6 months ago Deb Vandenbroucke MADISON, WI , US What can the world do with $1,400,000,000,000 instead? We have traveled down this path for too long.
33829 6 months ago Mary Bissell Rio Rancho, NM , US
33828 6 months ago Aubrey Nunes London, ot , GB
33827 6 months ago Karen Geszvain Madison, WI , US
33826 6 months ago al luque philadelphia, PA , US
33825 6 months ago Anonymous Pointe claire, QC , CA
33824 6 months ago Dorothy Anderson Weymouth, MA , US
33823 6 months ago Beth Olson Highlands, NC , US
33822 6 months ago Anonymous N/A, ot , AU The F-35 is a ridiculous piece of garbage!

Here's a list of the lovely nicknames for this aircraft.

JSF = Jinxed Spending Fiasco

JSF = Joint Scam Fixture

JSF = Ju...
33821 6 months ago Anonymous N/A, ot , AU Every stealth aircraft we've made before has had an extremely high cost because we know stealthy materials are ultra expensive.

Public disclosures of cost were high for aircraft that didn't...
33820 6 months ago Anonymous N/A, ot , AU It's actually a modern F-15E+ Advanced Eagle concept which would be the superior and more strategic option to a failed F-35A acquisition program.

But with regards to an F-15E+ option... thi...
33819 6 months ago Raymond Arent Severna Park, MD , US A total waste of money!
33818 6 months ago Anonymous N/A, ot , AU Speaking of stealth. How do you expect to hide the radar signature coming off the back of the F-35? There is nothing stealthy about the back of that plane. How are they going to hide the heat signat...
33817 6 months ago Anonymous N/A, ot , AU It's not data at all... it's at best an opinion!

But enlisted soldiers are not really allowed to have an opinion on their job and share it.
DOT&E is the only credible source. Their job...
33816 6 months ago Anonymous N/A, ot , AU What amazes me is how the pro-F-35 advocates/fanbase people are being encouraged to drink the Kool-Aid a.k.a. believing in total to indifference to what is real. Who have never looked at the facts a...
33815 6 months ago Anonymous N/A, ot , AU The F-35 has failed to make spec for combat radius. Failed to make spec for transonic acceleration. Failed to make spec for sustained turn rate. Failed to make spec for reliability. Failed to make s
It was also failing to make spec for weight. Except that weight simply can _not_ be fudged any further for this pudgy little porker of a jet. Especially not the F-35B model, which is right up against the limit of not being able to get off the ground with a combat load. So to make spec on weight, the program ripped out things like the onboard fire suppression.

Meanwhile, major mission-critical subsystems like the Elmer Fudd "magic helmet" still simply do not work as expected, despite tons of money having been poured into frantic re-engineering pushes.

And, the plane has massively missed its predicted targets in the two key areas of (a) delivery date and (b) cost.'); return false;">...
33814 6 months ago Anonymous N/A, ot , AU A little combat debut for the bastard F-35 of an aircraft with body bags filled with our special ops bubbas to accentuate the point.
33813 6 months ago Anonymous N/A, ot , AU The F-35 will be a terrible aeroplane. By all standards, when this thing is finished (if it is ever finished) it will have compromised so much in so many areas to fulfill those roles that it...
33812 6 months ago Anonymous N/A, ot , AU Never believe Lockheed Martin, Joint Project Office (JPO), Department of Defence, Air Force, Navy and Marine Corps top brasses, pro-F-35 advocates/fanbase people, the Government and the lobb...
33811 6 months ago Anonymous N/A, ot , AU The F-35 was defined during the early to mid-1990s to have “affordable” aerodynamic performance, stealth performance, sensor capabilities and weapons loads to be “affordably” effective against the m...
33810 6 months ago Georgina Wong Truro, ot , GB Time to stop producing weapons of war. STOP IT NOW !!!!!!!
33809 6 months ago Nancy Wigen Salt Spring Island, BC , CA This money saved from military spending and spent instead on solving social problems could do more to bring peace, security and stability than any jet war plane. $I.4rillion dollars could go a long...
33808 6 months ago cathy talbott Herrin, IL , US
33807 6 months ago Karen Phillips Alvin, TX , US
Next ->

By taking action you will be automatically signed up for action alerts from RootsAction. We consider your contact information to be private and confidential. We will NOT disclose it to any other entity unless you specifically authorize us to do so. You can unsubscribe at the bottom of any email you receive from us.

To endorse as an organization click here.

Why this matters:

The F-35 will kill and destroy while making us all less safe.
The F-35 is a first strike stealth weapon designed to penetrate air space undetected. It will be used for massive killing and destruction in more wars like Iraq, Libya, Yemen, Syria, and Vietnam in which millions of civilians have been killed and wounded and millions of refugees created. Despite the misery they caused, these wars did not make people in the United States safer, and they made things worse in each of the countries that U.S. warplanes and soldiers attacked. In fact, CIA director John Brennan told the U.S. Senate Intelligence Committee on June 16, 2016, that the wars since 2001 have not worked: “… despite all our progress against ISIL on the battlefield and in the financial realm, our efforts have not reduced the group’s terrorism capability and global reach.” In fact the war on terrorism has predictably and demonstrably increased rather than reduced terrorism. Gallup polling now finds that much of the world considers the United States the greatest threat to peace on earth. Nor is a fighter/bomber, like the F-35, capable of protecting anyone against nuclear ICBMs, cruise missiles, cyber attacks, global warming, or any individual acts of terrorism. The F-35 is designed for, among other things, delivery of the B61-12 nuclear weapon. Alaska's Congressional delegation has indicated several times that the F-35 is right for Alaska because of its proximity to Russia, making this weapon part of the new and perilous cold war.

The F-35 is a damaging trade-off.
1. Cost: The U.S. Air Force says the F-35 program will cost $1,400,000,000,000 over 50 years. The F-35 strips public money to pay private war contractors, like Lockheed Martin, that could better be spent to alleviate suffering, erase student debt, rebuild roads and bridges, defend against global warming, and provide education, health care, and housing. The money taken from such vital public use goes instead to war profiteers, increasing inequality and social division in the United States and elsewhere.

2. The F-35 destroys far more jobs than it creates: Researchers at the University of Massachusetts* report that each billion dollars spent on military preparations costs the United States between 4 and 16 thousand jobs as compared with tax cuts for working people or identical spending on clean energy, healthcare, or education. Thus, the $1.4 trillion, 50-year F-35 program means fewer jobs in the 45 U.S. states involved.
* http://www.peri.umass.edu/fileadmin/pdf/published_study/PERI_military_spending_2011.pdf
* http://www.ciponline.org/research/entry/promising-the-sky-pork-barrel-politics-and-the-f-35-combat-aircraft

3. The F-35 causes cognitive impairment of children: The U.S. Air Force says the F-35A is more than four times louder than the intensely loud F-16 that it is replacing. A World Health Organization (WHO) report says that noise at the level of the F-35 on takeoff for just one minute is sufficient to cause health consequences: The WHO report states that children are more sensitive than adults, and the report cites data showing that the effects of such aircraft noise on children include cognitive impairment: adverse effects on reading, memory, auditory discrimination, speech perception, and academic performance, as well as other health effects, including increased blood pressure and increased stress hormones.*
* http://www.who.int/ceh/capacity/noise.pdf
* http://www.euro.who.int/__data/assets/pdf_file/0008/136466/e94888.pdf

4. The F-35 makes houses unsuitable for residential use: The Federal Aviation Administration says there is no effective mitigation for this noise besides families leaving. In Burlington Vermont, where F-16 jets are now based, the federal government paid to purchase and demolish 150 affordable homes to protect the people from damaging F-16 noise. The U.S. Air Force says that basing 18 F-35 jets at the airport in Burlington will cause 2,252 acres of land holding 2,963 households with 6,663 people to be in the “unsuitable for residential use” noise zone.

5. The F-35 has both a high crash risk and high crash consequences: The U.S. Air Force says all new military jets have a very high risk of crashing. The F-35 has far worse consequences when it crashes in or near people than older jets. Whereas older military jets were made of aluminum, the body of the F-35 is made of military composite materials with a stealth coating which emit highly toxic chemicals, particles, and fibers when set on fire during the inferno when thousands of gallons of jet fuel burst into flames. An Air Force report says this catastrophe should not be allowed to happen near people. The only way to prevent this tragedy from happening is to prevent basing of such military jets in or near densely populated areas, like Burlington Vermont or any of the other towns and cities planned for basing.