Return to blog

Military Tribunals and You

Posted by Cindy Sheehan  

09:30 AM Feb 17, 2008

I have just returned from five days in Egypt. To me, visiting foreign countries is so enlightening as an American who grew up as parochial and nationalistic as the next. However, since my son was killed in Iraq, I have had a crash course in foreign “relations” and cultures that came with a too steep price.

Ironically, I was in Egypt because 40 members of the Muslim Brotherhood are being tried in military tribunals. Trying civilians in a military tribunal is against every law one can name (except in the US where we have the Military Commissions Act that contradicts international law and our own Constitution). While I was in Egypt to stand in solidarity with the families of the accused, I heard on the BBC about six men being tried at Guantanamo for the crime against humanity that occurred here on 9-11.

I turned on the TV in my motel room just as a military officer was reading the charges against the six detainees and for a brief moment my heart skipped a beat with joy. I mistakenly believed that the officer was reading charges against BushCo: “killing civilians; destroying civilian property and committing acts of terrorism.” My happiness that someone-anyone in our nation was taking his oath to “protect and defend our Constitution from all enemies foreign and domestic” seriously was short-lived, though, as the pictures of the six accused flashed on the screen.

Although the case against Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, et al and the 40 members of the Muslim Brotherhood could not be more different, there are also some similarities. We all know that Khalid Sheikh Mohammed is accused of being the “mastermind of 9-11” (hey, wasn’t that Osama bin Laden before it was Saddam Hussein?), however very few Americans know about the case of the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt.

Of course, when some people hear the term “Muslim Brotherhood” they are automatically going to be translating that into “terrorist.” These are the same people who get their "news" from Fox and believe that almost 5 million “terrorists” have been killed wounded or displaced in Iraq. These people could not be more wrong about the people of Iraq or the Muslim Brotherhood (MB). According to a scholarly article in Foreign Affairs (March/April 2007), the MB “reject global Jihad while embracing elections and other features of democracy.” The MB is a moderate Islamist group that is the largest and most influential in the world. The MB promotes change through the ballot box, non-violent protest and charity. As a woman, I may not like that the men (always nicely garbed in Western suits) wipe their hands off on their coats after they shake my hand, but they are in no way terrorists and are often targeted by radical Islamist groups that do not agree with the MB’s moderate positions.

It seems that the "crime" that the MB has committed in Egypt is winning too many seats in Parliament (as Independents as the MB is an outlawed organization in Egypt) and in coalition could have been an effective opposition voice to Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak who has been a puppet of American Imperialists since 1981. I heard many citizens in his country from cab drivers to tour guides derisively (and quietly) refer to Mubarak as "President for Life." Anyway, in an early morning raid over one year ago, 40 members of the MB were rounded up in tactics that reminded me of stories that my Iraqi friends have recounted: yelling soldiers bursting into their homes in early morning raids wearing riot gear and brandishing terrifying weapons; frightening women and children and hauling off the breadwinner to be swallowed by the depths of a prison in moves calculated to instill terror and suppress dissent.

After four civilian courts exonerated the accused, Mubarak had the prisoners transferred to a military prison and given a kangaroo court trial. The families are expecting a pre-determined guilty verdict that could carry strict sentences. And of course, George Bush, who is a paragon of virtue and respects “human rights and human dignity” (BBC interview, Feb 15th) has harshly condemned Mubarak and has threatened to withhold some American largesse (Egypt is second only to Israel in US aid) due to the gross violations of international law and human rights, right? Well, not exactly. While Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch, among others, has condemned the Egyptian government for this travesty, BushCo has been oddly silent.

Of course, although George can say that he has the “moral high ground” (BBC, again), of course the US is one of the international leaders in detaining people without due process and has committed water torture and other inhumane practices in the Middle East and in our own backyard in Guantanamo.

While I was in Guantanamo, Cuba and Cairo, Egypt advocating for human rights, I dared not make any judgment of an individual detainee’s guilt or innocence. Although the MB 40 have been acquitted four times, I cannot presume to judge the “evidence” that I haven't seen, anyway. And although the confessions of the six that will be on trial for 9-11 were garnered through torture, I of course, cannot judge their guilt or innocence, because I have not seen (nor will see) the evidence against them. This is the inherent problem of military tribunals: they are neither transparent nor fair and there is almost always a foregone verdict. This secrecy is not fair to the victims either who deserve to know the “truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth,” and rarely receive anything resembling “the truth.”

How do these military tribunals in Egypt and Guantanamo affect us here in the US? Americans always receive fair and equal treatment under the law, right? Wrong! Madam Justice's fabled scales are heavily weighted to benefit the wealthy or the established ruling class. Ask any person of color or poor citizen here how the American justice system works for them. There is no place for secrecy or suppression of dissent in any free, open or democratic society. In allowing these military tribunals to continue the very cornerstone of human rights is being shattered.

One does not have to be clever or have a particularly vivid imagination to fear an even harsher police state in America where any of us can be rounded up, tortured, and tried for opposing the government. Detention centers are already being built.

Besides, for argument’s sake, even if these military tribunals have absolutely no implication here in America, humans are being profoundly hurt by the policies of our allied governments that are dancing the "Totalitarian Two-step" and as MLK, Jr wrote from the Birmingham Jail:

Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere.

Add a comment

Hi Cindy!

— 09:42 PM Feb 17, 2008

Congratulations on your trip!

Unfortunately, Bush is still occupying the White House, Hillary still thinks she's God's gift to America and many Americans believe Obama is the Second Coming.

Save the world? We can't even save America from these predatory politicians and their bi-partisan crimewave.

I remind Americans daily about the need to STOP supporting party candidates and START supporting partyless candidates who support the Will of the People - the People's agenda.

Who in the hell believes either of these two parties are going to give us universal healthcare, universal college tuition, eliminate the federal income tax for the individual, cut the bloated Pentagon budget and institute open transparent, accountable government?

These things will ONLY come on the wings of partyfree candidates who support such an independent platform;
See, http://www.roncorvus.com/ivp.htm

.r o n

victims deserve "the truth, and nothing but the truth"

— 01:53 AM Feb 18, 2008

If the Guantanamo military tribunals, as expected, subject one or more of their prisoners to the death penalty, they will be forever denying the victims of 9/11 any truths such prisoners might have to offer about their role, or absence of a role, in those events. Perhaps this is one reason for the torture, the secrecy, and the death penalty. The torture, to get people to implicate others or confess to things they didn't do. The secrecy, to prevent the public from judging the evidence. And the death penalty, to ensure that whatever these prisoners might have revealed about who was behind the events of September 11, 2001, will be buried with them.

You said a mouthful there

— 10:55 AM Feb 21, 2008

"One does not have to be clever or have a particularly vivid imagination to fear an even harsher police state in America where any of us can be rounded up, tortured, and tried for opposing the government. Detention centers are already being built."

Paranoid? I doubt it. I fear that your country is but one more large terrorist attack away from heading down a road that will see it degenerate into the kind of failed state it so fears. The number of weapons and potential terrorists (mostly white and christian) within your own borders in such a situation would put Iraq, Afghanistan, Palestine, Lebanon, and just about anywhere else to shame.

This attack, which sadly is inevitable, will result in calls for even greater "security", tougher "measures", and a further reduction in "freedoms". An Orwellian world is only a few clever terrorits away.

It is so sad to see a great nation succumb to the terrorists, for in many ways we see this has already taken place. For those of you opposed to the BushCo war machine, the time is now to take your country back. I don't even know if you have time for an election to take place. Any terrorist worth their salt knows that one well-timed terrorist act could easily rob the Democrats of the next election (not that they have acquitted themselves particularly well as the party that will bring rationality and reason back to the forefront, but one can hope.)

BushCo has proven to be a great ally of terror - the unwitting and ignorant fulcrum in the Axis of Evil - and the terror merchants will be loathe to give up such a valuable partner.

"He who sacrifices freedom for security deserves neither." Benjamin Franklin.

There are so many wonderful, kind and caring people in your great country. I mourn for your losses and fear for your well-being. Good luck and God bless.

Pelosi

— 12:32 PM Feb 21, 2008

Cindy.. I want yu to rack up a big vote to let Pelosi and the Dem Party nationally know they are being watched. ONe doesn't have to go to Egypt to know enough about 'military tribunals'. I strongly urge you to put your time to better use and develope a more effective on the ground campaign here in San Francisco. You have only 8 months left to put together an effective campaign. Al Franken has spent two years campaigning in Minnesota against an incumbent who is not in as vaunted position as Pelosi. Your supporters deserve more than a report on Egypts autocracy.

Military "trials"

— 05:12 PM Feb 21, 2008

We the people of The United States Of America find the military "trials" of "detainees" at the hands of US "officers" to be a travesty to The Constitution Of The United States Of America and therefor we are outraged and livid to have the implication internationally and domestically that we are responsible for the crimes of The Bush Administration. We the people of The US do not want our names to be associated with torture or "secret evidence" that "defendants" and their "attorneys" can not see or hear.
We the people of The United States of America want The House Of Representatives of The USA, the only official body granted the power to stop: 1. Treason, 2. Bribery, 3. High crimes and misdemeanors by The President of The USA, to bring impeachment charges against President Bush and Vice President Chaney immediately. These two "executives" are suspected to have committed, "on its face": 1 Treason - Valerie Plame Wilson, 2 Bribery - no bid contracts regarding Iraq and Hurricane Katrina, 3 High crimes and misdemeanors - a litany including over 930 misrepresentations to the American people to leverage the illegal invasion and subsequent genocide/pilfering of Iraq as well as hooking up "big brother" in San Francisco at the AT&T building room 641A to illegally spy on all US citizens emails and telephone calls. Is the AT&T building in Speaker Nancy Pelosi's congressional district? Maybe this is why impeachment is "off the table"; that Nancy Pelosi is subverting The US Constitution and must be impeached first!


Login

You must login to post

Email:
Password:

Sign Up

Sign up for an account

Email
User ID
Password:
Confirm Password:

Forgot your password?

Email: